What Paradox?
I feel like the arguments I advanced against the Raven Paradox yesterday are valid, and yet not completely satisfying, because they do not address its strictly logical sense. In other words, I think statements like "all ravens are black" are not categorical and thus can't be proven in the sense that mathematical theorems are proven; nevertheless, I feel that there is a deeper logical inadequacy in the raven paradox that would invalidate it even if it did not have this deficiency. The basis of the raven paradox is that the statement "all ravens are black" should be logically equivalent to its " contrapositive ," "all non-black objects are not ravens." Nevertheless, there seems to be a difference between the two, because the first statement asserts something about ravens and the second does not. To illustrate, let's consider unicorns. Suppose I say that "all unicorns are white." The contrapositive is that "all non-whi...