Monday, August 24, 2015


You know, if I thought anyone actually read my blog, I'd probably be a lot more careful about what I write here.  I guess that's part of the thrill of blogging:  you never know when you might suddenly become a teen pop idol, or get sued for defamation, or something else exciting.

My first surprise was that someone responded to my post about the Mann vs. Steyn case to defend Michael Mann.  Since the person remained anonymous, I wonder if it isn't Mann himself; I've heard he spends a lot of time patrolling the internet looking for derogatory statements to defend himself from.

Then someone responded to the anonymous poster, saying pretty much exactly what I would have said:  that the case for being compared to a child molester seems pretty weak, and I thought the focus of the case centered on the use of "fraudulent" to describe the hockey stick graph.

And then the real surprise:  Mark Steyn himself cited my post over on his blog.  I have to admit, my first reaction is that his case may not be as strong as I thought if he would bother to cite me.  But let's give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that he believes me to be more worth citing than I actually am.

And just in case I have some new eyes on the blog (hey, I got nearly 80 hits a few days ago), I just have to mention that my book, "The Last Christian Peace: The Congress of Westphalia as a Baroque Event" came out in paperback a few weeks so.  Instead of $115, which is what the hardback cost, you can now have my wisdom for a mere $35, or less if you buy from a discount store.  No, it will not be nearly as entertaining as Mark Steyn's books, and it is completely bereft of humour, but I promise that it will be the most interesting book you ever read on the Peace of Westphalia.  (I was going to add, "...or your money back," but I'm afraid of the legal consequences of making such a statement; even if I honoured it, I might be violating my contract in some way.  So you'll have to trust me.)

You might also want to head over to my web site, Everything Peace of Westphalia, to see what else I have to say on the subject.  It has the advantage of having zero advertising, which is quite a rarity for a site with content.  (It's because nobody visits the site, not because I'm opposed to advertising, but you still benefit.)

Friday, August 21, 2015

Trial of the Century

I admire Mark Steyn.  Even if you disagree with everything he says -- and I'm sure a lot of people do -- he is a remarkable person.  A few years ago, Michael Mann, climate scientist and creator of Al Gore's famous "hockey stick" graph showing drastic warming in the last century, sued him for libel.  Steyn had called the hockey stick "fraudulent," among other things.  This is not the first time Mann has sued, although I'll be honest I'm having trouble finding other examples because these things don't get covered much in the mainstream media.

Steyn's co-defendants, National Review and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, are trying to get the case over with as soon as possible, which is a predictable reaction.  Steyn, on the other hand, views the suit as an aggressive attempt to shut down the debate, so he has no intention of settling.  In fact, he counter-sued Mann under anti-SLAPP legislation, which as I understand it seeks to defend people against frivolous, but expensive, lawsuits designed to shut down their free speech.

There are several remarkable things about this case.  One is that Steyn is not trying to get out from under it in the easiest way possible, which is what most people do.  The fact that he is confronting it and insisting that it go to trial shows that he is a man of unusual fortitude.  But, even if I were willing to take such a stand myself, I would surely be a basket case worrying about the consequences and unable to do much else.  Not Steyn.  He continues to publish and appear on talk shows.  Even more remarkable, he has published two BOOKS directly touching on the court case.  The first is Climate Change: The Facts, a collection of articles by nearly two dozen authors (including Steyn, but also many scientists) exposing the weaknesses in the argument for climate change.  Obviously, this was something that was on his mind a lot, and by preparing the book he has furnished himself with a stack of arguments why his statements about Mann were not libelous.

Second, and even more extraordinary, is his new book called A Disgrace to the Profession. Subtitled "The World's Scientists in their own words on Michael E. Mann, his hockey stick, and their damage to science," it is an even more direct and devastating attack on Mann.  More direct, because it is not about climate change in general but about Mann and the hockey stick in particular; but entirely indirect, because it is a book about what other scientists have said about Mann, with Steyn only filling in the backstory to each quotation.  If other scientists can say such things about Mann -- and they are really brutal in places -- then what court could reasonably convict Steyn of libel?

So my hat is off to Mark Steyn, not only because he is taking a courageous stand for free speech (the ACLU has filed an amicus brief on his behalf), but also for doing so in an incredibly gutsy and brilliant way.  He has some experience with such cases, having been hauled before Canada's mis-named "Human Rights Commimssion" for alleged Islamophobia, a charge he also beat.  But I don't think this stuff ever becomes routine.  It is clear that the suit bothers him and he wants it to be over, but not at the cost of allowing Mann and his ilk to stymie discussion through bullying tactics.