tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9181257353695396003.post7233950671188305040..comments2023-11-01T16:14:00.208-04:00Comments on A Curious Little Blog: Three stages in liberal denial of media biasDerekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08865541236246247617noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9181257353695396003.post-18874219342540695652010-12-12T09:03:15.140-05:002010-12-12T09:03:15.140-05:00FOX media, in general, is way more biased. They fi...FOX media, in general, is way more biased. They finally have libertarian shows though, which is making up for it. For example, Judge Napolitano and Stossle. How ever, when you watch how Rachel Maddow and Keith Olberman reacted to the, <a href="http://news.dedlines.com/rand-paul-supporters-stomp-protester-while-subduing-her" rel="nofollow">Rand Paul Supporter Stomp</a>, you see just how arrogant they can be, not really to biased, and I think their just trying to play the republican game of ignoring certain facts that don't make their position on the matter look good.. Also, when you blog about liberals you have to remember that there are liberal republicans and there are also fiscally conservative democrats. Is this your only blog Derek? If you repost your blogs on my blog, I will publish them on the front page. It will, with a doubt, bring you more traffic and recognition (Because I will optimize them for you for free!)Michael G. Pickett, Jr.https://www.blogger.com/profile/11742573873468769751noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9181257353695396003.post-38675856447523747152009-11-24T13:37:17.920-05:002009-11-24T13:37:17.920-05:00The problem is not that they are biased but that t...The problem is not that they are biased but that they pretend to be objective. Thus they chose to deceive the reader by presenting the "news" as just the facts when it is nothing but their slant on what facts they want you to know.<br /><br />But the more insidious side of this bias is that they treat the reader as unable to form a fair opinion on what they are supposedly reporting on. So they chose to not inform their readers of key information - for fear that they may use it incorrectly. If I were an exclusive reader of the NYT I would begin to wonder why I didn't know about what was going on with Van Jones. Or why this global warming thing is falling apart. The NYT won't tell me. As a result I need to go elsewhere to find out what is really going on and then make up my own mind on why this is or isn't important. In the end, the old time new media is killing itself. In a way there is an upside to this bias thing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9181257353695396003.post-59090381482765848842009-11-24T12:17:28.565-05:002009-11-24T12:17:28.565-05:00I like the idea of creating FAQ's, or Standard...I like the idea of creating FAQ's, or Standard Rebuttal Lists and CounterRebuttal Lists for some issues that come up over and over again.<br /><br />It'd be nice to be able to reply to some lib talking point...<br /><br />'that's defense number three, and rebuttal no. 2 totally swamps it.' followed by a link.<br /><br />I dunno. It might not work, but then again...<br /><br />TennwriterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9181257353695396003.post-2292057379407872262009-11-24T10:53:08.594-05:002009-11-24T10:53:08.594-05:00All public personalities and journalists who dissi...All public personalities and journalists who dissiminate information to the American public should voluntarily vote publicly and to publicly disclose on air the party which they voted for. If they voted Republican then an "(R) should appear after their name just like it does with politicians. This will give the viewer the option of filtering and absorbing the views and information accordingly. Journalists should have something similar to the Bar Association that governs their behavior and professional conduct and is capable of punishing those who violate the public trust.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com